Monday, 22 December 2014

Add bounding boxes and use those to exclude things from rendering

I've got my initial bounding box logic working. As I wrote before, the bounding boxes are stored on the node level of my BSP tree. For now I only calculate boxes for those nodes that actually refer to a model that needs to be rendered but the logic is so that branches in the tree can have a bounding box that encapsulates all the leaves inside and prevent a whole bundle of objects from rendering without evaluating the individual objects held within.

Now the bounding boxes are used in two stages.

The first which I've just implemented is a simple and straight forward on-screen test of the bounding box in software.
At this point in time I'm taking a shortcut by applying the following rules:
  1. As soon as one of the 8 vertices of the bounding box is on screen I stop checking and render my model. 
  2. If all of the 8 vertices are behind the camera, skip
  3. if all of the 8 vertices are above/below/to the left or to the right of the screen, skip
  4. Else render
#4 is where I've really cut a corner and I could end up rendering an object that is just off screen. What I should be doing here is check all the inner faces of the bounding box and skip rendering if all inner faces are off screen. I figured however that the one or two objects that are included while they shouldn't don't justify the extra expense as the first 3 points are very easy to check with the following code:
bool isVisible(matrix pModelViewProj) {
  vec3  verts[8];
  vec3  min;
  vec3  max;

  // Apply our matrix to our vertices
  for (int i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
    verts[i] = pModelViewProj * mVertices[i];

    // get the minimum and maximum values.. 
    if (i==0) {
      min = verts[i];
      max = verts[i];
    } else {
      if (min.x > verts[i].x) min.x = verts[i].x;
      if (min.y > verts[i].y) min.y = verts[i].y;
      if (min.z > verts[i].z) min.z = verts[i].z;

      if (max.x < verts[i].x) max.x = verts[i].x;
      if (max.y < verts[i].y) max.y = verts[i].y;
      if (max.z < verts[i].z) max.z = verts[i].z;
    }

    if ((verts[i].x >= -1.0) && (verts[i].x <= 1.0) && (verts[i].y >= -1.0) && (verts[i].y <= 1.0) && (verts[i].z < 1.0)) {
      // no need to check any further, this vertice is on screen!!
      return true;
    };
  };

  if ((max.z < 0.0) || (min.z > 1.0)) {
    // all vertices are behind the camera, no need to check any further
    return false;
  } else if ((max.x < -1.0) || (min.x > 1.0)) {
    // all vertices are to the left or right of the screen, no need to check any further
    return false;
  } else if ((max.y < -1.0) || (min.y > 1.0)) {
    // all vertices are to the top or bottom of the screen, no need to check any further
    return false;
  };

  // We assume any other situation is visible, if our object is somewhere just off a corner
  // we have a false positive
  return true;
};

Later on we'll also use our bounding box to do occlusion testing. Here we will actually attempt to render our bounding box to test if it is behind things already rendered to the screen. But that is for another day.

Unfortunately I won't know how much impact this change will have as I found out how badly my sample city is for the purpose. I wrongly made the assumption buildings would be separated out into separate models but they are not. The breakup is such that each group within the wavefront obj file covers the entire model and 95% of the model is still being rendered even with most off screen.

I'll either have to find a better way to split the model up or abandon this model for testing. I'll have to think some more about this.

No comments:

Post a Comment